Friday, March 13, 2020

DNA essays

DNA essays I am going to write about if Law Enforcement should team up with doctors to try and make society a safer and better place. There are three main things I am going to talk about proving a good idea: although Mary Faith ( A professor of Kansas medical center) had to say it was bad, getting DNA on newborns, therefore why would it be wrong to know your medical history. First I would like to write about how its a good idea for doctors and law enforcement to team up. Look at the potential DNA has to offer in solving a crime it is unbelievable. With the little amount needed to prove the conviction of a guilty party. There is nothing wrong with taking DNA from a criminal and keeping it on record, even if its from just a violent offender. There isnt anything immoral, or unethical if you are truly rehabilitated. Also with all knowledge of a sexual predator to be public knowledge to be known, according to Megans Law. Next I would like to put my emphasis on how good of an idea it is to take DNA from a newborn, unlike Mary. Whats wrong with taking DNA from a newborn and keeping a database, maybe and hopefully, it could deter and slow down crime in the United States. I mean DNA is everywhere in a crime scene a piece of hair, drop of blood, a piece of skin under the victims fingernails, or the semen of a male taken from a female. Its a good idea in my opinion to get a jump-start to stop crime in the next generation. Also I would like to talk about even if it was possible, which its not according to Charles Tindall, to know of a disease or a paternity result. What would be wrong with that? Personally I would like to know whom my father and or child is, or if I could have any chance of dying anytime soon. It would be great knowledge to know this kind of information in a pure society. this is a good idea it has its advantages that out way the disadvantages from the article, to ...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.